M0: план разработки, техническая структура, каркас проекта
- docs/PLAN.md — план по этапам, обновляется по мере работы - docs/TECHNICAL.md — слои, карта папок, контракты, рабочие процессы - docs/DECISIONS.md — журнал решений, принятых самостоятельно - разрешение 1080x1920, fit-width (портрет, 4:3..21:9) - каркас assets/scripts (core / modules / app / ui) - headless-тесты на vitest + strict typecheck + защита чистоты core - Rng: детерминированный генератор и перемешивание Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
||||
# Decision log
|
||||
|
||||
Choices made while implementing the specs, recorded so they can be challenged
|
||||
later. Each entry states what the specs left open, what was chosen and why.
|
||||
|
||||
Format: `YYYY-MM-DD` · area · decision.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Rules · Turn passes *past* a defender who took
|
||||
|
||||
GAMEPLAY.md says "after drawing cards move is passed to next player in clockwise
|
||||
order", but does not say what happens when the defender took the cards.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** The defender who took is skipped: the next attacker is the player
|
||||
after the defender. In 1v1 this means the same player attacks again — the
|
||||
standard rule, and the one that makes taking a real cost.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Rules · Interpretation of the add-card limits
|
||||
|
||||
GAMEPLAY.md gives three limits on attacking cards. The second one ("there should
|
||||
not be more attacking cards than card amount in defending player's hand") is
|
||||
ambiguous about *when* it is measured.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** A card may be added only if all three hold at the moment of adding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `table.length < 6` (`< 5` on the very first turn of the game);
|
||||
2. `unbeatenCount < defenderHandSize` — where `unbeatenCount` counts attack cards
|
||||
with no defence on them, and `defenderHandSize` is the defender's hand *at that
|
||||
moment*. Once the defender has declared a take, their hand no longer shrinks,
|
||||
so this freezes naturally;
|
||||
3. its rank matches the rank of some card already on the table, attack or
|
||||
defence alike.
|
||||
|
||||
The first attacking card of a turn is exempt from (3) — there is nothing on the
|
||||
table to match.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Rules · Attack order is serialised
|
||||
|
||||
In a real game attackers may throw cards in at any moment, concurrently with the
|
||||
defender thinking. Modelling genuine concurrency buys nothing for 1v1 against a
|
||||
bot and makes the state machine much harder to test.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** The core is a strict turn-based state machine with an explicit
|
||||
"who may act now" set. Attackers are polled for additions only when there are no
|
||||
unbeaten cards on the table, or after a take has been declared. This is
|
||||
behaviourally identical for 1v1 and extends cleanly to N players.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Architecture · Rules core is engine-independent
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** Everything under `assets/scripts/core/` is plain TypeScript with no
|
||||
`cc` import, no `Component`, no scene access, and no wall-clock time. The state
|
||||
machine is a pure reducer `apply(state, action) -> { state, events }` over a
|
||||
seeded RNG.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why.** It makes the entire rule set verifiable with `npm test` in a second, on
|
||||
any machine, with no editor running — which is the only practical way to build
|
||||
this unattended. It also leaves the door open for server-authoritative
|
||||
multiplayer later without a rewrite.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Architecture · Bots consume a restricted `PlayerView`
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** A bot never receives `GameState`. It receives a `PlayerView`: its
|
||||
own hand, the table, the trump card, counts (deck size, each opponent's hand
|
||||
size) and the discard count.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why.** It makes cheating structurally impossible rather than a matter of
|
||||
discipline, and a `PlayerView` is exactly the payload a future network protocol
|
||||
would send to a client.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Architecture · Savegame sections are self-registering
|
||||
|
||||
ARCHITECTURE.md asks for a save composed of independent classes, keyed by class
|
||||
name.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** Sections implement `ISaveSection { readonly key; save(); load(data) }`
|
||||
and register with `SaveManager`. The key is an explicit string constant, *not*
|
||||
`constructor.name`, because minification in release builds renames classes and
|
||||
would silently orphan every existing save.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Presentation · 1080×1920 design resolution, fit-width
|
||||
|
||||
UI.md requires portrait, 4:3 to 21:9. ART.md fixes the art budget at 1080 px wide.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** Design resolution 1080×1920 with `fitWidth = true`,
|
||||
`fitHeight = false`, so the width is always exactly 1080 design units and taller
|
||||
screens simply reveal more vertical space. Layout is anchored with widgets to
|
||||
top/bottom, the play area centred, and the safe-area inset respected on the top
|
||||
and bottom bars.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-13 · Art · Vector deck from `local/`, licence recorded
|
||||
|
||||
`local/Playing Cards` holds the Chris Aguilar "Vector Playing Cards" set
|
||||
(also mirrored on Wikimedia Commons), which is **LGPL-3.0**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision.** Use the 36 faces needed for a durak deck, rendered from the SVG
|
||||
sources so the downscale to the 1080-wide budget stays sharp. Attribution and
|
||||
licence text are recorded in `assets/art/cards/ATTRIBUTION.md`. The card back,
|
||||
table surface and UI chrome are not in that set and are authored for this project.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user